– I get cranky when I am constipated.
– Well, shit!
Recently, we wanted to make a test and see how we could find the maximum value between two variables using bitwise operations.
We ended up with the following peculiar way to get the biggest value between two variables using bitwise operations
r = a ^ ((a ^ b) & -(a < b));
The above formula has two modes:
a < b
a >= b
a < b
then the formula will change as follows:r = a ^ ((a ^ b) & 0xFFFFFFFF);
As we all (should) know, when one of the operators on a bitwise AND
operation is composed only from 1
s, then the result is whatever value the other operator was holding.
So, the formula then simplifies as follows:
r = a ^ (a ^ b);
which is equal to
r = b;
because we when we apply twice the same value using XOR
on another value, we revert back to the original value (so the second ^a
nullifies the first ^a
)
a >= b
then the formula will change as follows:r = a ^ ((a ^ b) & 0x00000000);
When one of the operators on a bitwise AND
operation is composed only from 0
s, then the result is always 0
no matter what value the other operator was holding.
So, the formula then simplifies as follows:
r = a ^ (0x00000000);
which is equal to
r = a;
because when one of the operators in a XOR
operation is only composed from 0
s then the result will be the value of the other operator, no matter what it was.
Below you will find a full example that compares the execution speed of the two methods by executing each several thousands of time on the same random data.
[download id=”3875″]
#include <stdio.h> #include <time.h> #include <stdlib.h> int main() { { const clock_t start = clock(); srand(10); unsigned long int i; unsigned int max = 0; for (i = 0; i < 1000000000; i++) { const int a = rand(); max = max < a ? a : max; } const clock_t end = clock(); const float seconds = (float) (end - start) / CLOCKS_PER_SEC; printf("Seconds elapsed %f\tIf statement. Overall max value = %u\n", seconds, max); } { const clock_t start = clock(); srand(10); unsigned long int i; unsigned int max = 0; for (i = 0; i < 1000000000; i++) { const int a = rand(); max = a ^ ((a ^ max) & -(a < max)); } const clock_t end = clock(); const float seconds = (float) (end - start) / CLOCKS_PER_SEC; printf("Seconds elapsed %f\tBitwise operation. Overall max value = %u\n", seconds, max); } return 0; }
Our results show that using the traditional if statement with assignment is faster than using our formula as expected.
Which makes sense as there is an if statement in the formula as well and then additional operations to get the result, instead of just the assignment.
Seconds elapsed 5.770000 If statement. Overall max value = 2147483647 Seconds elapsed 6.180000 Bitwise operation. Overall max value = 2147483647
10 times bigger input
Seconds elapsed 57.450001 If statement. Overall max value = 2147483647 Seconds elapsed 63.869999 Bitwise operation. Overall max value = 2147483647
The following command will create a compressed tar
archive for each folder found in the current directory.
It will use the LZMA/LZMA2 compression algorithms and it supports Unix-like file system metadata as well.
It will reuse the name of the folder for the archive as well and it will append the current date to the name.
find . -maxdepth 1 -mindepth 1 -type d -exec tar cJf "{}.`date +%F`.tar.xz" '{}' \;
The parameters we used for the find
command are the following:
-maxdepth levels
Descend at most levels (a non-negative integer) levels of directories below the command line arguments. -maxdepth 0
means only apply the tests and actions to the command line arguments.-mindepth levels
Do not apply any tests or actions at levels less than levels (a non-negative integer). -mindepth 1
means process all files except the command line arguments.-type d
Match directories (folders) onlyThe parameters we used for the tar
command are the following:
-c
create a new archive-J
filter the archive through xz
(compress the archive using the xz
lossless compression program)-f
file use archive named file